DEEPAK SUBHASHLAL GUGALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/4961/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14 AND 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030026222026
Filing Number
WP/1986/2026
Filing Date
17-01-2026
Registration No
WP/4961/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEEPAK SUBHASHLAL GUGALE
Adv. THOMBRE CHANDRAKANT V.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
EDUCATION OF SECONDARY
SHRI AMOLAK JAIN VIDYA PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
THE HEAD MASTER MOTILAL KOTHARI VIDYALAYA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court partly allowed the writ petition, finding that the Education Officer (Respondent No. 2) lacked authority to reject the petitioner's transfer proposal from an unaided to an aided Assistant Teacher position on 24.11.2025. The court remitted the matter to the Commissioner (Education), Maharashtra, Pune—the competent authority—to decide the proposal on merit within twelve weeks, with an opportunity for the school management to cure any deficiencies within two weeks if identified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court partly allowed the writ petition, finding that the Education Officer (Respondent No. 2) lacked authority to reject the petitioner's transfer proposal from an unaided to an aided Assistant Teacher position on 24.11.2025. The court remitted the matter to the Commissioner (Education), Maharashtra, Pune—the competent authority—to decide the proposal on merit within twelve weeks, with an opportunity for the school management to cure any deficiencies within two weeks if identified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts