The Branch Manager, SBI General Insurance Company Limited DAHAT ROHIT HARIBHAU vs Sonali Amol Lomate AND ORS. — CA/2011/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 173. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030025462026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

13-01-2026

Filing Number

CA/1927/2026

Filing Date

17-01-2026

Registration No

CA/2011/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

The Branch Manager, SBI General Insurance Company Limited DAHAT ROHIT HARIBHAU

Respondent(s)

Sonali Amol Lomate AND ORS.

Adv. DESHMUKH MOHIT R. FOR R/7,R/5 SERVED 1123

Shreyash Amol Lomate

Rushikesh Amol Lomate

Usha Vyankat Lomate

Dharma w/o Kashinath Memane

Everfresh Frozen Carriers Pvt Ltd

Branch Manager Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

24-06-2026

FOR ORDERS

15-04-2026

FOR ORDERS

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed applications in an insurance dispute between claimants Sonali Amol Lomate and others versus SBI General Insurance. The court granted a stay on execution of the judgment pending deposit of the award amount and permitted adult claimants (Nos. 1 and 4) to withdraw their shares with accrued interest, while directing that minor claimants' (Nos. 2 and 3) shares be kept in fixed deposit until majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed applications in an insurance dispute between claimants Sonali Amol Lomate and others versus SBI General Insurance. The court granted a stay on execution of the judgment pending deposit of the award amount and permitted adult claimants (Nos. 1 and 4) to withdraw their shares with accrued interest, while directing that minor claimants' (Nos. 2 and 3) shares be kept in fixed deposit until majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case