Kalyani Shankar Pandit ADV VIVEKANAND GUJAR vs Shankar P Rakesh Pandit — MCA/13/2026

Case under Transfer Matter Section 24. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030024012026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

14-01-2026

Filing Number

MCA/1826/2026

Filing Date

16-01-2026

Registration No

MCA/13/2026

Registration Date

19-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Transfer Matter Section 24

Petitioner(s)

Kalyani Shankar Pandit ADV VIVEKANAND GUJAR

Respondent(s)

Shankar P Rakesh Pandit

Adv. ,Vivekanand Manoharrao Maney,ADV. V. M. MANEY FOR R/SOLE (VP) 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

22-01-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

17-04-2026
27-03-2026
06-03-2026

AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

20-02-2026

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI

Case Summary: MCA/13/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted Kalyani Shankar Pandit's application to transfer her husband's divorce petition (HMP No. A-1541 of 2025) from Family Court No. 9 at Pune to Family Court at Aurangabad. The court found that the applicant has no income source, making it economically difficult for her to attend proceedings in Pune, and that consolidating this divorce case with her existing maintenance and criminal proceedings already pending at Aurangabad would serve the ends of justice and avoid hardship to the wife. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCA/13/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted Kalyani Shankar Pandit's application to transfer her husband's divorce petition (HMP No. A-1541 of 2025) from Family Court No. 9 at Pune to Family Court at Aurangabad. The court found that the applicant has no income source, making it economically difficult for her to attend proceedings in Pune, and that consolidating this divorce case with her existing maintenance and criminal proceedings already pending at Aurangabad would serve the ends of justice and avoid hardship to the wife. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case