Kalyani Shankar Pandit ADV VIVEKANAND GUJAR vs Shankar P Rakesh Pandit — MCA/13/2026
Case under Transfer Matter Section 24. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030024012026
e-Filing Number
14-01-2026
Filing Number
MCA/1826/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
MCA/13/2026
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalyani Shankar Pandit ADV VIVEKANAND GUJAR
Respondent(s)
Shankar P Rakesh Pandit
Adv. ,Vivekanand Manoharrao Maney,ADV. V. M. MANEY FOR R/SOLE (VP) 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-01-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 17-04-2026 | |
| 27-03-2026 | |
| 06-03-2026 | AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 20-02-2026 |
Orders
Case Summary: MCA/13/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted Kalyani Shankar Pandit's application to transfer her husband's divorce petition (HMP No. A-1541 of 2025) from Family Court No. 9 at Pune to Family Court at Aurangabad. The court found that the applicant has no income source, making it economically difficult for her to attend proceedings in Pune, and that consolidating this divorce case with her existing maintenance and criminal proceedings already pending at Aurangabad would serve the ends of justice and avoid hardship to the wife. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MCA/13/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted Kalyani Shankar Pandit's application to transfer her husband's divorce petition (HMP No. A-1541 of 2025) from Family Court No. 9 at Pune to Family Court at Aurangabad. The court found that the applicant has no income source, making it economically difficult for her to attend proceedings in Pune, and that consolidating this divorce case with her existing maintenance and criminal proceedings already pending at Aurangabad would serve the ends of justice and avoid hardship to the wife. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts