BABAN KRUSHNA KUDALE DIED THROUGH LRS SIMINTA BABAN KUDALE AND ORS. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AT OSMANABAD AND ANR. — CA/3558/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030022472026

Filing Number

CA/1704/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

CA/3558/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABAN KRUSHNA KUDALE DIED THROUGH LRS SIMINTA BABAN KUDALE AND ORS.

    Adv. PATIL LAXMIKANT C.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AT OSMANABAD AND ANR.

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard an application to bring the legal heirs of deceased claimant Baban Krushna Kudale on record in a land acquisition matter. The Court noted that the original advocate for Respondent No.2 (Acquiring Body) had passed away and appointed substitute counsel to represent that party. The case was adjourned to 17th June 2026 to allow the new advocate to file formal authorization documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/3558/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard an application to bring the legal heirs of deceased claimant Baban Krushna Kudale on record in a land acquisition matter. The Court noted that the original advocate for Respondent No.2 (Acquiring Body) had passed away and appointed substitute counsel to represent that party. The case was adjourned to 17th June 2026 to allow the new advocate to file formal authorization documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case