MADHAV VITTHALRAO WAZARGEKAR AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/1482/2017

Case under Maharashtra Co-op. Societies Act (Sec.2 (20)). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030021802017

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th February 2017

Filing Number

WP/1667/2017

Filing Date

17-01-2017

Registration No

WP/1482/2017

Registration Date

31-01-2017

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Co-op. Societies Act (Sec.2 (20))

Petitioner(s)

MADHAV VITTHALRAO WAZARGEKAR AND OTHERS

Adv. Avinash N. Irpatgire

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. GP FOR R/ 1 AND 2,R/ 4 TO 6 SERVED,R/ 3 SERVED,Suryawanshi Kamlakar J. 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

15-06-2017

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

06-02-2017

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

09-08-2017

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

20-03-2017

FOR ORDERS -UNSERVED NOTICE-CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

19-04-2017

FOR ORDERS UNSERVED NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, finding that petitioners had an equally efficacious alternative remedy available under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court permitted petitioners to file a revision within two months, with time spent prosecuting the petition to be considered for delay condonation, and directed the revisional authority to decide the matter expeditiously within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, finding that petitioners had an equally efficacious alternative remedy available under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court permitted petitioners to file a revision within two months, with time spent prosecuting the petition to be considered for delay condonation, and directed the revisional authority to decide the matter expeditiously within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case