PRAVIN BALIRAM PATIL AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/810/2015

Case under Constitution of India. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030021572015

Filing Number

WP/1526/2015

Filing Date

19-Jan-2015

Registration No

WP/810/2015

Registration Date

20-Jan-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Secondary School Code 1979

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVIN BALIRAM PATIL AND OTHERS

    Adv. Patil Vinod Prakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. GP FOR R.1 TO 4 1123

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/810/2015 (Pravin Baliram Patil v. State of Maharashtra) The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on June 8, 2026. The petitioner's advocate informed the court that due to passage of time, the petition had become infructuous (devoid of purpose), upon which the court accordingly dismissed it without adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  4. 05-Mar-2015

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya

  5. 22-Jan-2015

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. AchliyaView PDF

  6. 22-Jan-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Jan-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/810/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/810/2015 (Pravin Baliram Patil v. State of Maharashtra) The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on June 8, 2026. The petitioner's advocate informed the court that due to passage of time, the petition had become infructuous (devoid of purpose), upon which the court accordingly dismissed it without adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case