MONIKA DILIP INGLE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/5008/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030020042026

Filing Number

WP/1508/2026

Filing Date

14-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP/5008/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MONIKA DILIP INGLE

    Adv. Bachate Pralhad D.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION SECONDARY

  3. 3.THE EDUCATION OFFICER SECONDARY

  4. 4.GRAM SHIKSHAN VIKAS MANDAL GIDHADE THR ITS SECRETARY

  5. 5.G R PATIL SECONDARY SCHOOL GIDHADE THROUGH ITS HEAD MASTER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Dhule, to implement a May 2025 Grievance Committee order within four weeks, as the officer had failed to do so within the mandated 15-day deadline. The court warned of contempt proceedings and heavy costs for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5008/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Dhule, to implement a May 2025 Grievance Committee order within four weeks, as the officer had failed to do so within the mandated 15-day deadline. The court warned of contempt proceedings and heavy costs for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case