RAJMAL KANHAYYALAL SHARMA vs AKASH ENTERPRISES THROUGH PARTNER GURUMUKHDAS MEHRUMAL JAGWANI THROUGH GPA HARISH K MADWANI — WP/3334/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030017792019
Next Hearing
26th March 2019
Filing Number
WP/1301/2019
Filing Date
14-01-2019
Registration No
WP/3334/2019
Registration Date
06-03-2019
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJMAL KANHAYYALAL SHARMA
Adv. ANSARI ASFIA NUZHAT
Respondent(s)
AKASH ENTERPRISES THROUGH PARTNER GURUMUKHDAS MEHRUMAL JAGWANI THROUGH GPA HARISH K MADWANI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION [ AFTER NOTICE ]
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION [ AFTER NOTICE ]
DUE ADMISSION [ AFTER NOTICE ]
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2019 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 06-06-2019 | DUE ADMISSION [ AFTER NOTICE ] |
| 16-04-2019 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 25-06-2019 | DUE ADMISSION [ AFTER NOTICE ] |
| 08-06-2020 | DUE ADMISSION [ AFTER NOTICE ] |
Orders
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 3334 of 2019 filed by Rajmal Kanhayyalal Sharma against Akash Enterprises. The court found that the underlying Regular Civil Suit No. 82 of 2018 had already been settled through compromise, rendering the writ petition devoid of any surviving matter for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 3334 of 2019 filed by Rajmal Kanhayyalal Sharma against Akash Enterprises. The court found that the underlying Regular Civil Suit No. 82 of 2018 had already been settled through compromise, rendering the writ petition devoid of any surviving matter for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts