BABU NAGANNA TOTOD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/774/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030017342026
Filing Number
WP/1297/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
WP/774/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BABU NAGANNA TOTOD
Adv. JADHAVAR PRATAP V.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Adv. A G TALHAR FOR R NO 3,AGP FOR R NO 1 AND 2,Zakade Shrikrishna Nilkantrao FOR R.NO. 3 1123
THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER ADMIN O/O G. M. T.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-01-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 06-04-2026 |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed petitioner Babu Naganna Totod's writ petition challenging the Scrutiny Committee's invalidation of his Scheduled Tribe (Mannervarlu) claim. The court quashed the invalidation order and directed issuance of a conditional validity certificate, reasoning that the petitioner's son Saurabh had received conditional validity for the same tribe claim based on identical documentary evidence, and the State did not dispute their relationship. The certificate remains conditional pending re-verification of another family member's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed petitioner Babu Naganna Totod's writ petition challenging the Scrutiny Committee's invalidation of his Scheduled Tribe (Mannervarlu) claim. The court quashed the invalidation order and directed issuance of a conditional validity certificate, reasoning that the petitioner's son Saurabh had received conditional validity for the same tribe claim based on identical documentary evidence, and the State did not dispute their relationship. The certificate remains conditional pending re-verification of another family member's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts