BAKIR HUSSAIN SHAKIL ANSARI AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/838/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030017332025
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
WP/1377/2025
Filing Date
10-01-2025
Registration No
WP/838/2025
Registration Date
16-01-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BAKIR HUSSAIN SHAKIL ANSARI AND ANOTHER
Adv. SHINDE CHANDRAKANT K.
SHAHID JAMAL SHAKIL ANSARI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Adv. AGP For R.Nos.1 and 2.,Notice issued to R.No.3 is Served.,SHAH JAYANT RAMANLAL FOR R/4 1123
THE COLLECTOR NANDURBAR
THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SHAHADA THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-01-2025 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 22-06-2026 | |
| 10-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 20-01-2026 | URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL |
| 21-03-2025 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case WP/838/2025 Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition to June 22, 2026. Petitioners must remove office objections within two weeks or face dismissal in default. Respondent No.4 was granted time to file a reply, with a direction to appear personally if the reply is not filed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case WP/838/2025 Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition to June 22, 2026. Petitioners must remove office objections within two weeks or face dismissal in default. Respondent No.4 was granted time to file a reply, with a direction to appear personally if the reply is not filed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts