AMARPAL SINGH S/O. HARBINDAR SINGH SANDHU AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — APPLN/109/2019

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030012492019

Filing Number

APPLN/109/2019

Filing Date

09-Jan-2019

Registration No

APPLN/109/2019

Registration Date

09-Jan-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 324,323

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMARPAL SINGH S/O. HARBINDAR SINGH SANDHU AND OTHERS

    Adv. Kadam Gajanan G.

  2. 2.HARBINDER SINGH S/O. PREM SINGH SANDHU

  3. 3.NAYAN SINGH S/O. PREM SINGH SANDU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

    Adv. P.P. FOR R/1,ADV. SMITA R KASTURE FOR R/2 (APPOINTED) 1123

  2. 2.HARJEETSINGH AAMARJEETSINGH GIL

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

    Case Summary: In Criminal Application No. 109/2019 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench), the court adjourned the hearing to 19th June 2026. The applicants were absent, while the State's counsel and Respondent No. 2's advocate (who sought time after receiving the application that morning) were present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Regular Admission (Criminal )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  4. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

  5. 07-May-2026

    Regular Admission (Criminal )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

  7. 27-Apr-2026

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  10. 17-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  11. 14-Jan-2026

    Due Order Await Service Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  12. 10-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  13. 10-Dec-2025

    Due Orders Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  14. 26-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  15. 26-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  16. 12-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  17. 12-Nov-2025

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  18. 08-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

  19. 08-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  20. 10-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  21. 15-Apr-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  22. 04-Apr-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade,hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil

  23. 04-Apr-2019

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade , Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil

  24. 16-Jan-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat

  25. 16-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 09-Jan-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/109/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Criminal Application No. 109/2019 before the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench), the court adjourned the hearing to 19th June 2026. The applicants were absent, while the State's counsel and Respondent No. 2's advocate (who sought time after receiving the application that morning) were present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case