SHANKAR PUNJU BHIL AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/1470/2017
Case under Constitution of India Section ---. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030011942017
Next Hearing
06th February 2017
Filing Number
WP/947/2017
Filing Date
10-01-2017
Registration No
WP/1470/2017
Registration Date
31-01-2017
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHANKAR PUNJU BHIL AND ANOTHER
Adv. Patil R.C.,PATIL MANISHA RAJENDRA FOR PETITIONER NO. 3,PATIL MANISHA RAJENDRA FOR PETITIONER NO. 3, ,M L Dharashive,PATIL MANISHA RAJENDRA FOR PETITIONER NO. 3
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. GP FOR R/1 TO 3 & 5,Sawant Amol Shivajirao,Sawant Amol Shivajirao,M. V. KINI & CO.,Dhongade Anilkumar B.,RAJENDRA D SANAP FOR R.NO. 4,a 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-03-2017 | AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 06-02-2017 | URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL |
| 04-03-2020 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 20-08-2019 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 25-06-2019 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
Orders
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by a scheduled tribe member claiming ancestral land rights, finding that the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence proving his scheduled tribe status or familial relationship to the alleged ancestor who transferred the land. However, the court directed the Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhule to decide the petitioner's pending representation within two weeks in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by a scheduled tribe member claiming ancestral land rights, finding that the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence proving his scheduled tribe status or familial relationship to the alleged ancestor who transferred the land. However, the court directed the Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhule to decide the petitioner's pending representation within two weeks in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts