RAMESH BHANUDAS SHELKE Patil Shashikiran N. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — WP/34/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030011662021

Filing Number

WP/164/2021

Filing Date

08-Jan-2021

Registration No

WP/34/2021

Registration Date

11-Jan-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 302

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH BHANUDAS SHELKE Patil Shashikiran N.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL PRISON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the criminal writ petition filed by Ramesh Bhanudas Shelke against the State of Maharashtra, finding that the purpose of the petition had been accomplished. No substantive order was issued as the petitioner did not appear and the court's report indicated the matter's objective was already fulfilled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Orders Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  4. 08-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/34/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the criminal writ petition filed by Ramesh Bhanudas Shelke against the State of Maharashtra, finding that the purpose of the petition had been accomplished. No substantive order was issued as the petitioner did not appear and the court's report indicated the matter's objective was already fulfilled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case