PANDURANG RAGGHUNATHRAO SHEP AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — FA/2288/2018

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Aug-2018

CNR: HCBM030011072018

Filing Number

FA/791/2018

Filing Date

09-Jan-2018

Registration No

FA/2288/2018

Registration Date

09-Aug-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANDURANG RAGGHUNATHRAO SHEP AND ORS

    Adv. SHINGNAPURE RAVINDRA K

  2. 2.RAMBHAU S/O. LAKULA GHAUGULE DECEASED THROUGH LRS GAJRABAI.

  3. 3.jairam s/o. rambhau chaugule.

  4. 4.BALASAHEB S/O. RAMBHAU CHAUGULE.

  5. 5.TUKARAM BHAGUJI SHEP DECEASED THROUGH LRS JIJABAI.

  6. 6.VITHAL S/O. TUKARAM SHEP.

  7. 7.SHASHIKALA D/O. TUKARAM SHEP.

  8. 8.SHRIKRUSHNA S/O. TUKARAM SHEP.

  9. 9.SONALI D/O. SHRIRAM SHEP.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

    Adv. AGP WAIVES FOR R/1 & 2,GIRISH S. RANE FOR R/3,R/4 TO R/13 SERVED 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

    Case Summary: FA/2288/2018 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the appellants' land acquisition appeals, enhancing compensation from Rs. 5,000 per rupee to Rs. 57,750 per rupee. The court found the trial court erred by attributing Rs. 40 lakhs of a Rs. 45 lakh sale price to construction costs rather than land value, and relied on the unchallenged sale-deed as evidence of fair market value, applying appropriate deductions per Supreme Court precedent in *Manohar v. State of Maharashtra*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  12. 13-Jan-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  13. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  14. 06-Oct-2025

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  15. 11-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More

  17. 21-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. MoreView PDF

  18. 21-Aug-2025

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More

  19. 22-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. MoreView PDF

  20. 02-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Smt. Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

  21. 03-Mar-2020

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    According To Sitting List

  22. 07-Dec-2018

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane

  23. 22-Oct-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh,hon'ble Shri Justice K. K. SonawaneView PDF

  24. 22-Oct-2018

    Regular Admission (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh , Hon'ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane

  25. 14-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 09-Jan-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/2288/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FA/2288/2018 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the appellants' land acquisition appeals, enhancing compensation from Rs. 5,000 per rupee to Rs. 57,750 per rupee. The court found the trial court erred by attributing Rs. 40 lakhs of a Rs. 45 lakh sale price to construction costs rather than land value, and relied on the unchallenged sale-deed as evidence of fair market value, applying appropriate deductions per Supreme Court precedent in *Manohar v. State of Maharashtra*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case