SURESH RAMA PAWAR vs DIGAMBAR VITHAL BHOSALE AND OTHERS — HCBM30010732026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM030010732026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

SA/802/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Judge

Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

Coram

Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH RAMA PAWAR

    Adv. KULDEEP SUBHASHRAO PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIGAMBAR VITHAL BHOSALE AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SAVITABAI DIGAMBAR BHOSALE

  3. 3.NAGNATH DIGAMBAR BHOSALE

  4. 4.ABA DIGAMBAR BHOSALE

  5. 5.PRABHAVATIBAI MORTO DHUMALE

  6. 6.ARVIND MAROTI DHUMAL

  7. 7.SUREKHA MAROTI DHUMAL

  8. 8.TILOTTAMA SURESH PAWAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Case Summary: In Civil Application No. 5186 of 2026, the High Court at Aurangabad granted interim protection to petitioner Suresh Rama Pawar in a property dispute involving land at Village Bendga, Latur district. The court directed parties to maintain status quo regarding possession and the nature of the suit property until the next hearing, as the Trial Court had decreed in favor of Pawar while the First Appellate Court reversed those findings. The case was adjourned to 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)View PDF

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  5. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Civil Application No. 5186 of 2026, the High Court at Aurangabad granted interim protection to petitioner Suresh Rama Pawar in a property dispute involving land at Village Bendga, Latur district. The court directed parties to maintain status quo regarding possession and the nature of the suit property until the next hearing, as the Trial Court had decreed in favor of Pawar while the First Appellate Court reversed those findings. The case was adjourned to 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case