SUKHDEO VISHWANATH VAKALE PATIL K A TENGSE, D J CHOUDHARI vs THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND ORS — WP/481/2008

Case under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Jan-2008

CNR: HCBM030009362008

Filing Number

WP/550/2008

Filing Date

09-Jan-2008

Registration No

WP/481/2008

Registration Date

22-Jan-2008

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKHDEO VISHWANATH VAKALE PATIL K A TENGSE, D J CHOUDHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND ORS

    Adv. COPY SERVED ON GP S G SHINDE FOR R/10 CVTR.,G P FOR R NO. 1 AND 2,R/ 3 TO 6,8,9,11,13 AND 15 SERVED,M S CHOUDHARI FOR R NO. 3 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on May 7, 2026. The petition concerned the petitioner's resignation from the post of Sarpanch, but since the village panchayat's term had already expired and no petitioner appeared, the court found the relief sought was no longer viable and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2019

    For Ordinary Matters On Warned List ( S.J. )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta

  4. 06-Feb-2008

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A. H. Joshi

  5. 06-Feb-2008

    Notification

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A. H. Joshi

  6. 23-Jan-2008

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Jan-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/481/2008

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on May 7, 2026. The petition concerned the petitioner's resignation from the post of Sarpanch, but since the village panchayat's term had already expired and no petitioner appeared, the court found the relief sought was no longer viable and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case