MANDABAI CHANDRAKANT SURYAWANSHI AND OTHERS vs THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF LAND RECORD LATUR AND OTHERS — WP/367/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030009292019
Next Hearing
10th January 2019
Filing Number
WP/673/2019
Filing Date
08-01-2019
Registration No
WP/367/2019
Registration Date
09-01-2019
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANDABAI CHANDRAKANT SURYAWANSHI AND OTHERS
Adv. More P. P.
Respondent(s)
THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF LAND RECORD LATUR AND OTHERS
Adv. GP FOR R/1 AND 2,R/3,6 AND 7 SERVED,R/4 AND 5 SERVED,AMBAD SHRINIVAS ABHIMANYU,AMBAD SHRINIVAS ABHIMANYU 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-01-2019 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 12-02-2019 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 17-04-2020 | REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL) |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/367/2019 The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad allowed the writ petition and quashed the District Superintendent of Land Records' order dated 12/11/2018, finding that the Superintendent lacked jurisdiction to decide the matter and was required to forward it to the Deputy Director instead. The court held that where an authority acts without jurisdiction, the High Court can intervene despite alternate remedies being available, and remitted the matter to the Deputy Director for fresh decision after hearing both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/367/2019 The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad allowed the writ petition and quashed the District Superintendent of Land Records' order dated 12/11/2018, finding that the Superintendent lacked jurisdiction to decide the matter and was required to forward it to the Deputy Director instead. The court held that where an authority acts without jurisdiction, the High Court can intervene despite alternate remedies being available, and remitted the matter to the Deputy Director for fresh decision after hearing both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts