KINETIC ENGINEERING LTD vs RAMRAO HANUMANTRAO KANDEKAR — WP/2397/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030004632026

Filing Number

WP/334/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP/2397/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
M. R. T. P. U. L. P

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KINETIC ENGINEERING LTD

    Adv. BEDRE VINAYAK SUDHAKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMRAO HANUMANTRAO KANDEKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition filed by Kinetic Engineering Ltd, modifying the Labour Court's order dated 05.12.2025. The parties amicably settled their dispute with the company agreeing to pay Rs. 24 lakh to the respondent/workman as full and final settlement of all claims. In return, the workman unconditionally withdrew the criminal complaint and all pending cases, with an assurance not to initiate any future proceedings against the company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2397/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition filed by Kinetic Engineering Ltd, modifying the Labour Court's order dated 05.12.2025. The parties amicably settled their dispute with the company agreeing to pay Rs. 24 lakh to the respondent/workman as full and final settlement of all claims. In return, the workman unconditionally withdrew the criminal complaint and all pending cases, with an assurance not to initiate any future proceedings against the company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case