CHETANKUMAR PRAKASH MALI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/4998/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030004442026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/320/2026

Filing Date

05-01-2026

Registration No

WP/4998/2026

Registration Date

04-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981

Petitioner(s)

CHETANKUMAR PRAKASH MALI

Adv. Bachate Pralhad D.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDCATION SECONDARY

THE EDUCATION OFFICER SECONDARY

KRANTIJYOTI SAVITRIBAI PHULE SHIKSHAN PRASARAK SANSTHA VIDYANAGARI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

SMT DHANABAI KAUTIK KHALANE KANYA HIGH SCHOOL THROUGH ITS HEADMASTER

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Case Summary: WP 4998/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Dhule, to implement a Grievance Committee decision dated 26.05.2025 that had set aside all previous orders against petitioner Chetankumar Prakash Mali (a Shikshan Sevak) within four weeks, warning of contempt proceedings and heavy costs for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 4998/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Dhule, to implement a Grievance Committee decision dated 26.05.2025 that had set aside all previous orders against petitioner Chetankumar Prakash Mali (a Shikshan Sevak) within four weeks, warning of contempt proceedings and heavy costs for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case