MAHENDRA KANTILAL CHOUDHARI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/4850/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030004322026
Filing Number
WP/312/2026
Filing Date
05-01-2026
Registration No
WP/4850/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHENDRA KANTILAL CHOUDHARI
Adv. Bachate Pralhad D.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION SECONDARY
THE EDUCATION OFFICER SECONARY
KRANTIJYOTI SAVITRIBAI PHULE SHIKSHAN PRASARAK SANSTHA VIDYANAGARI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
SMT DHANABAI KAUTIK KHALANE KANYA HIGH SCHOOL THROUGH ITS HEADMASTER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/4850/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Dhule, to implement a Grievance Committee decision dated 26.05.2025 within four weeks. The petitioners, Shikshan Sevaks, challenged the officer's failure to comply with the committee's order—which set aside previous decisions and required reconsideration—within the mandated 15-day period. The court warned that non-compliance would result in contempt proceedings and heavy costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/4850/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Dhule, to implement a Grievance Committee decision dated 26.05.2025 within four weeks. The petitioners, Shikshan Sevaks, challenged the officer's failure to comply with the committee's order—which set aside previous decisions and required reconsideration—within the mandated 15-day period. The court warned that non-compliance would result in contempt proceedings and heavy costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts