ASHLESHA MURLIDHAR JADHAV vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/5000/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030004262026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/306/2026

Filing Date

05-01-2026

Registration No

WP/5000/2026

Registration Date

04-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981

Petitioner(s)

ASHLESHA MURLIDHAR JADHAV

Adv. Bachate Pralhad D.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION SECONDARY

THE EDUCATION OFFICER SECONDARY

KRANTIJYOTI SAVITRIBAI PHULE SHIKSHAN PRASARAK SANSTHA VIDYANAGARI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

SMT DHANABAI KAUTIK KHALANE KANYA HIGH SCHOOL THROUGH ITS HEADMASTER

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Dhule, to implement the Grievance Committee's decision of 26.05.2025 within four weeks, after the officer failed to comply within the mandated 15-day period. The court warned that non-compliance would result in contempt of court proceedings and heavy costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Dhule, to implement the Grievance Committee's decision of 26.05.2025 within four weeks, after the officer failed to comply within the mandated 15-day period. The court warned that non-compliance would result in contempt of court proceedings and heavy costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case