BANKAT BHAWANI KARDAL vs VISHWAMBAR SHANKARRAO MHASKE AND ANOTHERS Advocate - Gaikawad Pandurang M. — WP/127/2016

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Jan-2016

CNR: HCBM030001572016

Filing Number

WP/131/2016

Filing Date

04-Jan-2016

Registration No

WP/127/2016

Registration Date

06-Jan-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)
Indian Evidence Act 1872
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANKAT BHAWANI KARDAL

    Adv. Shaikh Mujtaba Gulam Mustafa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHWAMBAR SHANKARRAO MHASKE AND ANOTHERS Advocate - Gaikawad Pandurang M.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/127/2016 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and set aside the trial court's rejection of the plaintiff's application for court-commissioned joint measurement of adjacent properties (Gut Nos. 471 and 470) in an encroachment possession suit. The court held that separate measurements by parties without joint verification were insufficient; proper adjudication of boundary disputes requires a competent government official (DILR/TILR) to conduct joint measurements with notice to all parties and prepare an official map. The trial court was ordered to appoint a Court Commissioner accordingly and decide the underlying 2009 suit within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 27-Nov-2025

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  5. 06-Nov-2025

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh

  6. 14-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin S. DeshmukhView PDF

  7. 14-Oct-2025

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh

  8. 29-Sep-2025

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  9. 22-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  10. 21-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

  11. 21-Apr-2025

    Due Orders -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Justice Smt. Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  12. 21-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Smt. Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

  13. 21-Mar-2025

    Due Orders -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Justice Smt. Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  14. 21-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Smt. Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

  15. 21-Feb-2025

    Due Orders -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Justice Smt. Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  16. 24-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Smt. Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

  17. 24-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Smt. Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  18. 03-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Smt. Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

  19. 25-Jun-2020

    Due Admission CIVIL

    According To Sitting List

  20. 25-Feb-2016

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. JadhavView PDF

  21. 25-Feb-2016

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav

  22. 17-Feb-2016

    Urgent Circulation -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav

  23. 28-Jan-2016

    Await Notices -CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav

  24. 07-Jan-2016

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. JadhavView PDF

  25. 07-Jan-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 04-Jan-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/127/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/127/2016 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and set aside the trial court's rejection of the plaintiff's application for court-commissioned joint measurement of adjacent properties (Gut Nos. 471 and 470) in an encroachment possession suit. The court held that separate measurements by parties without joint verification were insufficient; proper adjudication of boundary disputes requires a competent government official (DILR/TILR) to conduct joint measurements with notice to all parties and prepare an official map. The trial court was ordered to appoint a Court Commissioner accordingly and decide the underlying 2009 suit within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case