BANKAT BHAWANI KARDAL vs VISHWAMBAR SHANKARRAO MHASKE AND ANOTHERS Advocate - Gaikawad Pandurang M. — WP/127/2016

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030001572016

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th January 2016

Filing Number

WP/131/2016

Filing Date

04-01-2016

Registration No

WP/127/2016

Registration Date

06-01-2016

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)
Indian Evidence Act 1872
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

BANKAT BHAWANI KARDAL

Adv. Shaikh Mujtaba Gulam Mustafa

Respondent(s)

VISHWAMBAR SHANKARRAO MHASKE AND ANOTHERS Advocate - Gaikawad Pandurang M.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

17-02-2016

URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL

25-06-2020

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

28-01-2016

AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

07-01-2016

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

25-02-2016

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Case Summary: WP/127/2016 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and set aside the trial court's rejection of the plaintiff's application for court-commissioned joint measurement of adjacent properties (Gut Nos. 471 and 470) in an encroachment possession suit. The court held that separate measurements by parties without joint verification were insufficient; proper adjudication of boundary disputes requires a competent government official (DILR/TILR) to conduct joint measurements with notice to all parties and prepare an official map. The trial court was ordered to appoint a Court Commissioner accordingly and decide the underlying 2009 suit within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/127/2016 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and set aside the trial court's rejection of the plaintiff's application for court-commissioned joint measurement of adjacent properties (Gut Nos. 471 and 470) in an encroachment possession suit. The court held that separate measurements by parties without joint verification were insufficient; proper adjudication of boundary disputes requires a competent government official (DILR/TILR) to conduct joint measurements with notice to all parties and prepare an official map. The trial court was ordered to appoint a Court Commissioner accordingly and decide the underlying 2009 suit within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case