RAFIK KHAN HABIB KHAN PATHAN vs RUKHSANA FAKIR PATHAN AND OTHERS — WP/357/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM030001162026
Filing Number
WP/74/2026
Filing Date
03-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP/357/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAFIK KHAN HABIB KHAN PATHAN
Adv. BHANDARI ANAND P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.RUKHSANA FAKIR PATHAN AND OTHERS
Adv. R.NO. 2 SERVED. 1123
-
2.SHAKILABI SHAIKH RAJU
-
3.YASIN HABIB PATHAN
-
4.RASHIDABI HABIB KHAN PATHAN
-
5.NASRIN WASIM KHAN PATHAN
-
6.THE TAHSILDAR KANNAD
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) ordered the petitioners in seven consolidated writ petitions to take necessary steps within four weeks from March 24, 2026, failing which all petitions shall be dismissed without further notice. Any interim relief granted, if applicable, shall continue until the expiry of the four-week period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
03-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
14-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
14-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/357/2026
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) ordered the petitioners in seven consolidated writ petitions to take necessary steps within four weeks from March 24, 2026, failing which all petitions shall be dismissed without further notice. Any interim relief granted, if applicable, shall continue until the expiry of the four-week period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts