ABDUL HASAN ALI KHURRAM ALI HASHMI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/13/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Jan-2019

CNR: HCBM030001092019

Filing Number

CP/30/2019

Filing Date

03-Jan-2019

Registration No

CP/13/2019

Registration Date

09-Jan-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL HASAN ALI KHURRAM ALI HASHMI

    Adv. KULKARNI SANKET S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. R.3 SERVED,Anjali Dube 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the Continuation Petition after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the purpose of the petition had been subserved. No substantive judgment on merits was issued; the petition was simply closed based on the petitioner's stated satisfaction with the outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2020

    Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]

    According To Sitting List

  4. 15-Jan-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. GavhaneView PDF

  5. 15-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Jan-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/13/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the Continuation Petition after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the purpose of the petition had been subserved. No substantive judgment on merits was issued; the petition was simply closed based on the petitioner's stated satisfaction with the outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case