Mehul Hasmukh Shah Hriya Tushar Gandhi vs Hasmukh Kantilal Shah — TP/2574/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020429322025

e-Filing Number

29-12-2025

Filing Number

TP/42931/2025

Filing Date

30-Dec-2025

Registration No

TP/2574/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mehul Hasmukh Shah Hriya Tushar Gandhi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hasmukh Kantilal Shah

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2574/2026 On 9th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard the testamentary petition filed by Mehul Hasmukh Shah and Hriya Tushar Gandhi against Hasmukh Kantilal Shah and adjourned the matter for directions. The court directed the office to issue citations and notices to the Collector, and the petitioner's advocate to effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff of Mumbai. The matter was left open for relisting after all procedural compliances are satisfied and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 30-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2574/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2574/2026 On 9th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard the testamentary petition filed by Mehul Hasmukh Shah and Hriya Tushar Gandhi against Hasmukh Kantilal Shah and adjourned the matter for directions. The court directed the office to issue citations and notices to the Collector, and the petitioner's advocate to effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff of Mumbai. The matter was left open for relisting after all procedural compliances are satisfied and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case