Raghavendra Ramanna Naik vs Siddamma Ramanna Naik — TP/2055/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020427102025

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

25-12-2025

Filing Number

TP/42707/2025

Filing Date

26-12-2025

Registration No

TP/2055/2026

Registration Date

10-04-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

Raghavendra Ramanna Naik

Adv. SANDESH S SHETYE

Respondent(s)

Siddamma Ramanna Naik

Hearing History

Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

23-04-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

23-04-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Case TP/2055/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition was called for direction on 23rd April, 2026, with the petitioner absent. The court directed the office to issue a citation and notice to the Collector, and the advocate to serve non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions and granted liberty to list the matter for final grant upon completion of all compliance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2055/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition was called for direction on 23rd April, 2026, with the petitioner absent. The court directed the office to issue a citation and notice to the Collector, and the advocate to serve non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions and granted liberty to list the matter for final grant upon completion of all compliance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case