CHHAYA RAJESH KOTHARI AND ANR Mir Hamid Ahmad vs LATE DEVILAL BHERULAL KOTHARI — TP/2035/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020424272025

e-Filing Number

24-12-2025

Filing Number

TP/42426/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

TP/2035/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHAYA RAJESH KOTHARI AND ANR Mir Hamid Ahmad

  2. 2.MAULIK RAJESH KOTHARl

    Adv. Mir Hamid Ahmad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LATE DEVILAL BHERULAL KOTHARI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2035/2026 The testamentary petition concerning the will of Late Devilal Bherulal Kothari was called for directions on 23rd April 2026. The court ordered the office to issue a Citation and Notice to the Collector, and directed the petitioner's advocate to file an Affidavit of Service and effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions and granted liberty to list the matter for final grant after all compliance requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2035/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2035/2026 The testamentary petition concerning the will of Late Devilal Bherulal Kothari was called for directions on 23rd April 2026. The court ordered the office to issue a Citation and Notice to the Collector, and directed the petitioner's advocate to file an Affidavit of Service and effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions and granted liberty to list the matter for final grant after all compliance requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case