J.P.DECKS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. vs J.P. INFRA (MUMBAI) PRIVATE LIMITED — S/68/2026

Case under Companies Act & Rules 1956 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020424112025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

S/42410/2025

Filing Date

24-12-2025

Registration No

S/68/2026

Registration Date

18-03-2026

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Companies Act & Rules 1956 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

J.P.DECKS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.

Adv. Solicis Lex

Respondent(s)

J.P. INFRA (MUMBAI) PRIVATE LIMITED

VIJAYKUMAR OMPRAKASH JAIN CHAIRMAN/DIRECTOR OF JP INFRA PVT.LTD.

SHUBHAM VIJAYKUMAR JAIN FORMER DIRECTOR OF JP INFRA PVT. LTD.

CHHAGANLAL VASUDEO KHETAN DIRECTOR OF JP INFRA PVT. LTD.

THE CEO SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER -7 SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

09-06-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

09-06-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Case Summary: S/68/2026 The case was adjourned to 30.06.2026. Defendant No. 1 (J.P. INFRA) was directed to file a written statement within 90 days of receiving the Writ of Summons (dated 24.04.2026), or the suit will be transferred to the Undefended Suits list. Defendants 1-3 were successfully served, but service on Defendant No. 4 was unsuccessful; plaintiff's counsel was directed to file an affidavit of service by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S/68/2026 The case was adjourned to 30.06.2026. Defendant No. 1 (J.P. INFRA) was directed to file a written statement within 90 days of receiving the Writ of Summons (dated 24.04.2026), or the suit will be transferred to the Undefended Suits list. Defendants 1-3 were successfully served, but service on Defendant No. 4 was unsuccessful; plaintiff's counsel was directed to file an affidavit of service by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case