J.P.DECKS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. vs J.P. INFRA (MUMBAI) PRIVATE LIMITED — S/68/2026
Case under Companies Act & Rules 1956 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020424112025
Filing Number
S/42410/2025
Filing Date
24-Dec-2025
Registration No
S/68/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.J.P.DECKS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.
Adv. Solicis Lex
Respondent(s)
-
1.J.P. INFRA (MUMBAI) PRIVATE LIMITED
-
2.VIJAYKUMAR OMPRAKASH JAIN CHAIRMAN/DIRECTOR OF JP INFRA PVT.LTD.
-
3.SHUBHAM VIJAYKUMAR JAIN FORMER DIRECTOR OF JP INFRA PVT. LTD.
-
4.CHHAGANLAL VASUDEO KHETAN DIRECTOR OF JP INFRA PVT. LTD.
-
5.THE CEO SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
-
6.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER -7 SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
-
7.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Case Summary: S/68/2026 The case was adjourned to 30.06.2026. Defendant No. 1 (J.P. INFRA) was directed to file a written statement within 90 days of receiving the Writ of Summons (dated 24.04.2026), or the suit will be transferred to the Undefended Suits list. Defendants 1-3 were successfully served, but service on Defendant No. 4 was unsuccessful; plaintiff's counsel was directed to file an affidavit of service by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
For Direction
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
24-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. S/68/2026
Case Summary: S/68/2026 The case was adjourned to 30.06.2026. Defendant No. 1 (J.P. INFRA) was directed to file a written statement within 90 days of receiving the Writ of Summons (dated 24.04.2026), or the suit will be transferred to the Undefended Suits list. Defendants 1-3 were successfully served, but service on Defendant No. 4 was unsuccessful; plaintiff's counsel was directed to file an affidavit of service by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts