Simara Foods vs Vardhaman Mehta — CHOL/29/2026
Case under The Commercial Courts,commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act,2015 Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020417572025
e-Filing Number
19-12-2025
Filing Number
CHOL/41756/2025
Filing Date
19-Dec-2025
Registration No
CHOL/29/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )
Sub-Category
Restoration which are rejected under Rule 986 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Simara Foods
Adv. Swapan Samdani
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vardhaman Mehta
-
2.Prakash Agro Commodity
-
3.Vardhaman Commercial
-
4.Pritesh Maheshwari
-
5.Manju Maheshwari
-
6.Ritu Sharma
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
The court granted Simara Foods' chamber order to restore the suit that was rejected on 16.07.2025 for non-compliance with office objections, condoning a 110-day delay caused by the plaintiff's senior citizen status, a colleague's overseas residence, and communication gaps with counsel. The court found no prejudice to defendants, who can contest the suit on merits, and directed the plaintiff to remove office objections and file compliance within four weeks or face rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
For Hearing And Final Disposal
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
19-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CHOL/29/2026
The court granted Simara Foods' chamber order to restore the suit that was rejected on 16.07.2025 for non-compliance with office objections, condoning a 110-day delay caused by the plaintiff's senior citizen status, a colleague's overseas residence, and communication gaps with counsel. The court found no prejudice to defendants, who can contest the suit on merits, and directed the plaintiff to remove office objections and file compliance within four weeks or face rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts