Bhavika Kaushal Shah vs Chandrakant Chimanlal Shah — TP/424/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020416252025
e-Filing Number
18-12-2025
Filing Number
TP/41624/2025
Filing Date
19-Dec-2025
Registration No
TP/424/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Probate ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhavika Kaushal Shah
Adv. Umang Shah
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chandrakant Chimanlal Shah
Case History
-
15-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
Summary: The petition for probate of the last Will and Testament of deceased Chandrakant Chimanlal Shah (died 02.09.2025) filed by petitioner Bhavika Kaushal Shah (named Executrix) is granted. All legal formalities including petitioner's oath, attesting witnesses' affidavits, and service of general citation have been complied with, and no other legal heirs exist. The office is directed to issue the Probate after verifying that no cross petition or caveat has been filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Jan-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
-
19-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. TP/424/2026
Summary: The petition for probate of the last Will and Testament of deceased Chandrakant Chimanlal Shah (died 02.09.2025) filed by petitioner Bhavika Kaushal Shah (named Executrix) is granted. All legal formalities including petitioner's oath, attesting witnesses' affidavits, and service of general citation have been complied with, and no other legal heirs exist. The office is directed to issue the Probate after verifying that no cross petition or caveat has been filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts