Harish Murlidhar Bohra vs MURLIDHAR JAGANNATH BOHRA — MPT/289/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020411352025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

15-12-2025

Filing Number

MPT/41134/2025

Filing Date

16-12-2025

Registration No

MPT/289/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2
Hindu Succession Act

Petitioner(s)

Harish Murlidhar Bohra

Adv. AKASH WARANG

Respondent(s)

MURLIDHAR JAGANNATH BOHRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

17-04-2026

MISC. PETITION FOR ADMISSION / FINAL HEARING [UNDER BOMBAY REGULATION ACT ,VIII]

12-06-2026

MISC. PETITION FOR ADMISSION / FINAL HEARING [UNDER BOMBAY REGULATION ACT ,VIII]

Orders

18-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

The Bombay High Court granted Harish Murlidhar Bohra's petition for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, finding that he is the sole legal heir of the deceased Murlidhar Jagannath Bohra. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to compliance with any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted Harish Murlidhar Bohra's petition for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, finding that he is the sole legal heir of the deceased Murlidhar Jagannath Bohra. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to compliance with any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case