SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED vs SUNIL KISAN KHAIRE S/O KISAN KHAIRE — EXA/110/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020409842025

Filing Number

EXA/40983/2025

Filing Date

15-Dec-2025

Registration No

EXA/110/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. Disha Karambar and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KISAN KHAIRE S/O KISAN KHAIRE

  2. 2.AMOL VASUDEV KADAM S/O VASUDEV TUKARAM KADAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards in bulk, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, provided no written waiver exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 15-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/110/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards in bulk, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, provided no written waiver exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case