Saikiran Prem Thakur vs The Branch Manager Canara Bank — IA/102/2026
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 278. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020408642025
e-Filing Number
12-12-2025
Filing Number
IA/40863/2025
Filing Date
15-12-2025
Registration No
IA/102/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saikiran Prem Thakur
Adv. Simran R. Jumani
Respondent(s)
The Branch Manager Canara Bank
The Branch Manager Bank of Baroda Formerly known as Vijaya Bank
The Branch Manager, State Bank of India
The Branch Manager, ING Vyasa Bank Limited
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
INTERIM APPLICATION
INTERIM APPLICATION
INTERIM APPLICATION
INTERIM APPLICATION
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS-1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-01-2026 | INTERIM APPLICATION |
| 19-06-2026 | INTERIM APPLICATION |
| 17-04-2026 | INTERIM APPLICATION |
| 27-03-2026 | INTERIM APPLICATION |
| 13-02-2026 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS-1 |
Orders
Case Summary: IA 102/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Saikiran Prem Thakur's interim application seeking disclosure of bank account and fixed deposit details held by the deceased (Prem Girdharilal Thakur). The court found that the four banks (Canara Bank, Bank of Baroda, State Bank of India, and one other) had failed to respond to the petitioner's advocate's letters requesting this information, which was necessary to complete the property schedule in the pending succession petition. The court directed all four bank branch managers to provide the required details within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: IA 102/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Saikiran Prem Thakur's interim application seeking disclosure of bank account and fixed deposit details held by the deceased (Prem Girdharilal Thakur). The court found that the four banks (Canara Bank, Bank of Baroda, State Bank of India, and one other) had failed to respond to the petitioner's advocate's letters requesting this information, which was necessary to complete the property schedule in the pending succession petition. The court directed all four bank branch managers to provide the required details within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts