Lintas India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 16( — WP/2044/2026
Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section Sections115WD,115WE,154,244Aand115WL. Disposed: Contested--ABSOLUTE on 16th February 2026.
CNR: HCBM020403582025
e-Filing Number
09-12-2025
Filing Number
WP/40356/2025
Filing Date
10-12-2025
Registration No
WP/2044/2026
Registration Date
27-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P. COLABAWALLA , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P. COLABAWALLA , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA
Bench Type
Division
Category
DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )
Sub-Category
PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
16th February 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ABSOLUTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lintas India Private Limited
Adv. DHARAN V GANDHI
Respondent(s)
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 16(
Mumbai Advocate - P A NARAYANAN, ,P A NARAYANAN,P A NARAYANAN
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 8, Mumbai
Adv. P A NARAYANAN
Director of Income Tax (CPC)
The Central Board of Direct Taxes,
The Union of India
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P. COLABAWALLA , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA
FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF
FOR PASSING ORDER
FOR PASSING ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-02-2026 | FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF |
| 09-02-2026 | FOR PASSING ORDER |
| 16-02-2026 | FOR PASSING ORDER |
Orders
The Bombay High Court's April 24, 2026 order affirmed its earlier February 16, 2026 judgment directing the Income Tax authorities to grant a refund to Lintas India Private Limited. After confirming that both parties had complied with the refund directions, the court closed the matter as no further orders were necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court's April 24, 2026 order affirmed its earlier February 16, 2026 judgment directing the Income Tax authorities to grant a refund to Lintas India Private Limited. After confirming that both parties had complied with the refund directions, the court closed the matter as no further orders were necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts