LOK EVERST CO OP HSG. SOC. LTD. vs JAYDEEP DEVELOPERS Advocate - Minal Parab — APP/72/2026

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section 1. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020393022025

Next Hearing

30th April 2026

Filing Number

APP/39301/2025

Filing Date

04-12-2025

Registration No

APP/72/2026

Registration Date

23-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD

Coram

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD

Bench Type

Division

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Division Bench Matters ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section 1
Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

LOK EVERST CO OP HSG. SOC. LTD.

Adv. Solicis Lex

Respondent(s)

JAYDEEP DEVELOPERS Advocate - Minal Parab

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

EVEREST INDUSTRIES LTD.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD

02-02-2026

FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF

Orders

15-04-2026
REGISTRAR(OS)/PROTHONOTARY and SR. MASTER

The High Court of Bombay extended the time for the appellant to remove office objections on Appeal (L) No. 39301/2025 and Interim Application (L) No. 39303/2025 until 29.04.2026, subject to payment of Rs. 2,500 cost to the High Court Employees Medical Welfare Fund. The appeal and interim application will be rejected for non-compliance if office objections are not removed by the extended deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay extended the time for the appellant to remove office objections on Appeal (L) No. 39301/2025 and Interim Application (L) No. 39303/2025 until 29.04.2026, subject to payment of Rs. 2,500 cost to the High Court Employees Medical Welfare Fund. The appeal and interim application will be rejected for non-compliance if office objections are not removed by the extended deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case