INDUSIND BANK LTD., vs PUSKAR RAJARAM YADAV — EXA/383/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020387982024

Filing Number

EXA/38788/2024

Filing Date

20-Dec-2024

Registration No

EXA/383/2025

Registration Date

15-Feb-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDUSIND BANK LTD.,

    Adv. adv amol shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUSKAR RAJARAM YADAV

  2. 2.LALCHAND JAMUNA PRASAD KESARWANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's landmark decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time spent in the invalidated arbitration excluded from limitation periods, while allowing relief only if there was an express written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna,national Lok AdalatView PDF

  4. 13-Dec-2025

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna , National Lok Adalat

  5. 20-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/383/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's landmark decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time spent in the invalidated arbitration excluded from limitation periods, while allowing relief only if there was an express written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case