Jet Privilege Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India — HCBM20386612025
Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74, 73. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020386612025
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
28-11-2025
Filing Number
WP/38660/2025
Filing Date
29-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jet Privilege Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES
Respondent(s)
Union of India
Adv. ,GP OS,GP OS,GP OS 1123
State of Maharashtra
Adv. GP OS
Deputy Commissioner of State Tax
Adv. GP OS
Commissioner of State Tax
Adv. GP OS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of Jet Privilege Pvt. Ltd.'s writ petition challenging a GST show cause notice dated 30 June 2025 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax. Since a final order had already been passed on the show cause notice (26 December 2025) during petition pendency, the court directed the petitioner to pursue its appellate remedy before the Appellate Authority instead of seeking relief in the writ petition. The court granted liberty to file an appeal within three weeks with all contentions kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of Jet Privilege Pvt. Ltd.'s writ petition challenging a GST show cause notice dated 30 June 2025 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax. Since a final order had already been passed on the show cause notice (26 December 2025) during petition pendency, the court directed the petitioner to pursue its appellate remedy before the Appellate Authority instead of seeking relief in the writ petition. The court granted liberty to file an appeal within three weeks with all contentions kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts