MANSUKH MANLAL CHHEDA vs MANILAL GANGJI SHAH AKA CHHEDA — MPT/109/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 26th March 2026.

CNR: HCBM020380312025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

25-11-2025

Filing Number

MPT/38029/2025

Filing Date

26-11-2025

Registration No

MPT/109/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

MANSUKH MANLAL CHHEDA

Adv. Jay Gala

Respondent(s)

MANILAL GANGJI SHAH AKA CHHEDA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

26-03-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

Orders

26-03-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

The Bombay High Court allowed the petition and issued a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 for the deceased Manilal Gangji Shah, recognizing Mansukh Manilal Chheda (son), Mrs. Vimlaben Manilal Shah (wife), Mrs. Meeta Atul Malde (daughter), Mr. Nitin Ramji Shah (son-in-law), and Mr. Pratik Nitin Gogri (grandson) as the sole legal heirs and representatives. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks after resolving any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed the petition and issued a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 for the deceased Manilal Gangji Shah, recognizing Mansukh Manilal Chheda (son), Mrs. Vimlaben Manilal Shah (wife), Mrs. Meeta Atul Malde (daughter), Mr. Nitin Ramji Shah (son-in-law), and Mr. Pratik Nitin Gogri (grandson) as the sole legal heirs and representatives. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks after resolving any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case