MANSUKH MANLAL CHHEDA vs MANILAL GANGJI SHAH AKA CHHEDA — MPT/109/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 26th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM020380312025
e-Filing Number
25-11-2025
Filing Number
MPT/38029/2025
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
MPT/109/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )
Sub-Category
HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANSUKH MANLAL CHHEDA
Adv. Jay Gala
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANILAL GANGJI SHAH AKA CHHEDA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
The Bombay High Court allowed the petition and issued a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 for the deceased Manilal Gangji Shah, recognizing Mansukh Manilal Chheda (son), Mrs. Vimlaben Manilal Shah (wife), Mrs. Meeta Atul Malde (daughter), Mr. Nitin Ramji Shah (son-in-law), and Mr. Pratik Nitin Gogri (grandson) as the sole legal heirs and representatives. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks after resolving any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MPT/109/2026
The Bombay High Court allowed the petition and issued a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 for the deceased Manilal Gangji Shah, recognizing Mansukh Manilal Chheda (son), Mrs. Vimlaben Manilal Shah (wife), Mrs. Meeta Atul Malde (daughter), Mr. Nitin Ramji Shah (son-in-law), and Mr. Pratik Nitin Gogri (grandson) as the sole legal heirs and representatives. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks after resolving any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts