MURLI RAJU KHARVI vs THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI — WP/1775/2026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020380292025

Filing Number

WP/38027/2025

Filing Date

26-Nov-2025

Registration No

WP/1775/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MURLI RAJU KHARVI

    Adv. Bina R Pai

  2. 2.MOHAN RAJU KHARVI

  3. 3.ROHAN RAJU KHARVI

  4. 4.GEETA RAJESH KHARVI

  5. 5.RAJESH KHAWOO KHARVI

  6. 6.ROHIT RAJESH KHARVI

  7. 7.GANESH RAJESH KHARVI

  8. 8.KRISH RAJESH KHARVI

  9. 9.SHEETAL VINOD UGREJA

  10. 10.SANJANA VINOD UGREJA

  11. 11.POOJA KISHAN KHARVI

  12. 12.POOJA AAKASH KHARVI

  13. 13.AAKASH RAJU KHARVI

  14. 14.SARIKA MANOJ KAVITHYA

  15. 15.BHARTI RAVI BHOJAYA

  16. 16.PRABHABAI KISAN KHARVI

  17. 17.SUNITA SATISH ANDHEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  2. 2.THE ASSISTANT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

    Adv. GP OS

  4. 4.DADAR POLICE STATION

    Adv. GP OS

  5. 5.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

    Adv. GP OS

  6. 6.TECHNO FRESHWORLD LLP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by hutment dwellers against police harassment, holding that respondents are bound to take action against petitioners only in accordance with law and following due process. The court preserved petitioners' right to pursue appropriate legal remedies if they challenge disturbance to their settled possession, disposing the petition with liberty to apply later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  11. 23-Dec-2025

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  12. 19-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  13. 19-Dec-2025

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  14. 01-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  15. 01-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 26-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1775/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by hutment dwellers against police harassment, holding that respondents are bound to take action against petitioners only in accordance with law and following due process. The court preserved petitioners' right to pursue appropriate legal remedies if they challenge disturbance to their settled possession, disposing the petition with liberty to apply later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case