Sudhakar Krishna Swar vs Hirabai Krishna Swar — TP/2544/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020379962025

e-Filing Number

24-11-2025

Filing Number

TP/37995/2025

Filing Date

25-Nov-2025

Registration No

TP/2544/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sudhakar Krishna Swar

    Adv. NILAM S SHINDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hirabai Krishna Swar

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2544/2026 The case was called for direction on 8th June 2026 with no petitioner present. The Court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate was ordered to file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs per BHC Rules 399-400, furnish an Administration Bond per Rule 421, and verify if any cross petition exists. Liberty was granted to list the matter for final grant after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 25-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2544/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2544/2026 The case was called for direction on 8th June 2026 with no petitioner present. The Court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate was ordered to file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs per BHC Rules 399-400, furnish an Administration Bond per Rule 421, and verify if any cross petition exists. Liberty was granted to list the matter for final grant after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case