Thorat Wine Mart vs Surekha Ravindra Thorat — ARBP/522/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020375502024
e-Filing Number
10-12-2024
Filing Number
ARBP/37541/2024
Filing Date
10-Dec-2024
Registration No
ARBP/522/2025
Registration Date
16-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
Challenge Tribunal Order under Section 17 ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thorat Wine Mart
Adv. ABHIJEET P RANE
-
2.SANJEEV NAKUL THORAT
Adv. Drupad Sopan Patil,PRASAD GANU KELUSKAR
-
3.MOHAN NAKUL THORAT
Adv. Drupad Sopan Patil,PRASAD GANU KELUSKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Surekha Ravindra Thorat
Adv. ,Shailendra S Kanetkar,Suraj Kaushik 1123
-
2.RAHUL RAVINDRA THORAT
Adv. Suraj Kaushik
-
3.DHIRAJ RAVINDRA THORAT
Adv. Suraj Kaushik
-
4.SAGAR RAVINDRA THORAT
Adv. Suraj Kaushik
-
5.BHAVNA TUSHAR TANPURE
Adv. SHAILENDRA SHRIKANT KANETKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award in a partnership dispute. The court upheld the arbitrator's decision granting the deceased partner's heirs 40% share in partnership profits and property from 2001 (when the partner died) onwards, finding that accounts were never settled between the parties as required by Section 37 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The court rejected the respondents' arguments based on a signed balance sheet and limitation defenses, holding that full contractual compliance was necessary to override the statutory profit-sharing entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
18-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
08-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
-Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
18-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
18-Dec-2025
At 4.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
13-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
26-Sep-2025
Final Hearing-Section 34
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
19-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
19-Sep-2025
Final Hearing-Section 34
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
12-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
Part-Heard
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
12-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Final Hearing-Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
22-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
22-Jul-2025
Circulation Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
18-Jul-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
10-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
08-Jul-2025
Circulation Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
06-May-2025
Circulation Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
15-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
15-Apr-2025
Circulation Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
25-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
25-Mar-2025
Post-Notice/ Interim Relief-Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
21-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
21-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
24-Jan-2025
High On Board -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
07-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
07-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. ARBP/522/2025
Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award in a partnership dispute. The court upheld the arbitrator's decision granting the deceased partner's heirs 40% share in partnership profits and property from 2001 (when the partner died) onwards, finding that accounts were never settled between the parties as required by Section 37 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The court rejected the respondents' arguments based on a signed balance sheet and limitation defenses, holding that full contractual compliance was necessary to override the statutory profit-sharing entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts