ANANT SAKHARAM VICHARE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH A.G.P. HIGH COURT — HCBM20374102025

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020374102025

Filing Number

WP/37409/2025

Filing Date

20-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Single

Category

HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT ( 50 )

Sub-Category

Housing Area Development ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANANT SAKHARAM VICHARE

    Adv. AMAR GHARTE

  2. 2.PUSPALATA TUKARAM KADAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH A.G.P. HIGH COURT

  2. 2.MUMBAI BUILDING REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION

  3. 3.MUMBAI BUILDING REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCION BOARD

  4. 4.LAXMAN KRISHNA VICHARE

  5. 5.KISABAI LAXMAN VICHARE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Case Summary WPL 37409 of 2025 - Anant Sakharam Vichare vs. State of Maharashtra The High Court of Bombay found the petition was filed before the wrong bench (a Division Bench instead of a Single Judge bench as required). The Court ordered the officer to verify the petition and place it before the appropriate Single Judge bench, and removed it from the current board's docket. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Nov-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary WPL 37409 of 2025 - Anant Sakharam Vichare vs. State of Maharashtra The High Court of Bombay found the petition was filed before the wrong bench (a Division Bench instead of a Single Judge bench as required). The Court ordered the officer to verify the petition and place it before the appropriate Single Judge bench, and removed it from the current board's docket. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case