LAXMAN RAMCHANDRA THALI AND 45 ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, AT THE INSTANCE OF THE CITY SURVEY OFFICER — HCBM20370582025
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 226. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020370582025
Filing Number
WP/37057/2025
Filing Date
18-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Bench Type
Division
Category
COMPENSATION ( 7 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAXMAN RAMCHANDRA THALI AND 45 ORS
Adv. V K DUBEY ASSOCIATES
-
2.PACHUBAI DAMODAR THALI
-
3.SANDEEP DAMODAR THALI
-
4.JITENDRA DAODAR THALI
-
5.MANGESH DAMODAR THALI
-
6.SHARAD DAMODAR THALI
-
7.MILIND DAMODAR THALI
-
8.MAMTA SAILESH PURO
-
9.PUSHPA PARSHURAM THALI
-
10.RUPESH PARSHURAM THALI
-
11.NAYAN PARSHURAM THALI
-
12.ARUNA JAYWANT DUNGIKAR
-
13.LATA JANARDAN PATIL
-
14.SUSHMA JAGDISH TANDEL
-
15.LILABAI SADANAND THALI
-
16.DINESH SADANAND THALI
-
17.GIRISH SADANAND THALI
-
18.MANISH MORESHWAR THALI
-
19.KAILAS SADANAND THALI
-
20.BALCHANDRA JANARDAN THALI
-
21.HARISHCHANDRA JANARDAN THALI
-
22.ASHA JAYWANT PATIL
-
23.JYOTI NARENDRA PATIL
-
24.MANOJ RAMNATH MHATRE
-
25.RAKESH JAYRAM MHATRE
-
26.JAYESH JAYRAM MHATRE
-
27.AHA KAMALAKAR THALI
-
28.AMRUT KAMALAKAR THALI
-
29.ATISH KAMALAKAR THALI
-
30.PRAMILA RAJENDRA MHATRE
-
31.SHILPA ARVIND GHARAT
-
32.JAYRAM RAMCHANDRA THALI
-
33.GULAB KAMALAKAR PATIL
-
34.NIRABAI JAGANNATH THALI
-
35.KALPANA RAVINDRA THALI
-
36.MAHESH MORESHWAR THALI
-
37.TEJASHRI AMARNATH THALI
-
38.NALINI MADHUKAR THALI
-
39.CHETAN DATTATRAY GAVAND
-
40.MANISH DATTATRAY GAVAND
-
41.SWATI RAMLAL BHURE
-
42.NILESH JAGANNATH THALI
-
43.LALIT JAGANNATH THALI
-
44.SUNIL JAGANNATH THALI
-
45.VIKAS JAGANNATH THALI
-
46.VANDANA MANOJ MHATRE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, AT THE INSTANCE OF THE CITY SURVEY OFFICER
Adv. ,GP OS,GP OS 1123
-
2.THE OFFICE OF DISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAIGAD
Adv. GP OS
-
3.CIDCO CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LIMITED
-
4.MMRDA (MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY)
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
Case Summary The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition without issuing notice. The court found petitioners failed to clearly establish their property rights despite land acquisition proceedings initiated in 1970 and awards issued in 1983. The court directed the District Collector, Raigad to file an affidavit within four weeks and listed the case for further consideration on 15 June 2026, suggesting petitioners pursue compensation grievances in civil court instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
27-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
17-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
Case filed
Case Summary The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition without issuing notice. The court found petitioners failed to clearly establish their property rights despite land acquisition proceedings initiated in 1970 and awards issued in 1983. The court directed the District Collector, Raigad to file an affidavit within four weeks and listed the case for further consideration on 15 June 2026, suggesting petitioners pursue compensation grievances in civil court instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts