Vijaya Vijay Bharnble Ganesh K Peddi vs Ganu Anant Sangelkar — TP/2532/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020362942025

e-Filing Number

12-11-2025

Filing Number

TP/36292/2025

Filing Date

12-Nov-2025

Registration No

TP/2532/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijaya Vijay Bharnble Ganesh K Peddi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ganu Anant Sangelkar

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case TP/2532/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition was called for directions on 8th June 2026 with no petitioner present. The court directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector, required the advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, and instructed verification of any cross petitions. The case was adjourned with liberty to relist after all procedural compliance is completed and the matter is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 12-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2532/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2532/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition was called for directions on 8th June 2026 with no petitioner present. The court directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector, required the advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, and instructed verification of any cross petitions. The case was adjourned with liberty to relist after all procedural compliance is completed and the matter is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case