Abdul Kalam Abdul Aziz Khan vs Abdul Aziz Lais Mohammad Khan Sunni Muslim deceased — HCBM20362202025
Case under Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act Section 1. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020362202025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
11-11-2025
Filing Number
TP/36219/2025
Filing Date
12-11-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Letters of Administration with Will ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul Kalam Abdul Aziz Khan
Adv. Rakhee V Gadankush
Alimuddin Abdul Aziz Khan
Adv. GADANKUSH RAKHEE VINOD
Abdul Kalim Abdul Aziz Khan
Adv. GADANKUSH RAKHEE VINOD
Abdul Karim Abdul Aziz Khan
Adv. GADANKUSH RAKHEE VINOD
Respondent(s)
Abdul Aziz Lais Mohammad Khan Sunni Muslim deceased
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
FOR REJECTION UNDER RULE 986
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FOR REJECTION UNDER RULE 986 |
Orders
The Bombay High Court granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections in four civil petitions (TPL/34339/2025, TPL/34645/2025, TPL/36219/2025, and TPL/36421/2025) within three weeks. The petitions will be rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986 if the objections are not addressed by the deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections in four civil petitions (TPL/34339/2025, TPL/34645/2025, TPL/36219/2025, and TPL/36421/2025) within three weeks. The petitions will be rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986 if the objections are not addressed by the deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts