DHIREN MOHANLAL THANKI vs CEO AND MANAGING DIRECTOR UCO BANK AND 7 ORS Advocate - ASHOK D SHETTY, ,Rita K. Joshi,RESP NOS.1 TO 6 — WP/497/2019

Case under Service Matter. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Dec-2019

CNR: HCBM020358452018

Filing Number

WP/4391/2018

Filing Date

28-Dec-2018

Registration No

WP/497/2019

Registration Date

20-Feb-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Service Matter

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHIREN MOHANLAL THANKI

    Adv. LAXMAN VENKATESAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CEO AND MANAGING DIRECTOR UCO BANK AND 7 ORS Advocate - ASHOK D SHETTY, ,Rita K. Joshi,RESP NOS.1 TO 6

  2. 2.SUNIL KAKKAR

  3. 3.B.B.SAHAI

  4. 4.CHANCHAL MAZUMDAR

  5. 5.ASHOK K MAKHIJA

  6. 6.AMRUTBHAI J PATEL

  7. 7.RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

  8. 8.THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL BUREAU O INVESTIGATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a UCO Bank removal order from March 2014, filed in December 2018, on two grounds: gross delay and laches of nearly 4.5 years without adequate justification, and failure to exhaust the alternate remedy of departmental appeal before approaching the court. The court found the petitioner's excuse of pursuing CBI and gratuity proceedings insufficient to justify the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    For Dismissal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  5. 26-Sep-2024

    Due Admission - 2

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  6. 03-May-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

  7. 03-May-2024

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  8. 19-Jul-2023

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  9. 28-Jun-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  10. 02-Sep-2020

    For Admission

    According To Sitting List

  11. 20-Feb-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. KarnikView PDF

  12. 20-Feb-2020

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik

  13. 24-Jan-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. KarnikView PDF

  14. 24-Jan-2020

    Petition For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik

  15. 13-Dec-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Surendra Pandharinath Tavade,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.View PDF

  16. 13-Dec-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 13-Sep-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel,hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. DharmadhikariView PDF

  18. 07-Jun-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel,hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. DharmadhikariView PDF

  19. 28-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/497/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a UCO Bank removal order from March 2014, filed in December 2018, on two grounds: gross delay and laches of nearly 4.5 years without adequate justification, and failure to exhaust the alternate remedy of departmental appeal before approaching the court. The court found the petitioner's excuse of pursuing CBI and gratuity proceedings insufficient to justify the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case