HARSHA HEMANT BHOWAD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. — WP/381/2016

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020357922015

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WP/3633/2015

Filing Date

23-12-2015

Registration No

WP/381/2016

Registration Date

09-02-2016

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act

Petitioner(s)

HARSHA HEMANT BHOWAD

Adv. Jayesh Ramesh Vyas

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Adv. ,GP OS,RESPONDENT NO. 1 AND 3,ANOOP U PATIL,RES NO. 4,akshay madan gosavi,RES NO 05 1123

ASSISTANT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER (Respondent No.

ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR,WESTERN SUBURBS (Respondent No.

SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY (Respondent No.

YASHWANT SITARAM KHAIRMODE (Respondent No.

(DELETED )

RANJANA Y. KHAIRMODE (Respondent No. 5a)

PRAFUL Y. KHAIRMODE (Respondent No. 5b)

PRATIBHA Y. KHAIRMODE (Respondent No. 5c)

PRIYA RAKESH AAKHADE (Respondent No. 5d)

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

22-06-2016

FOR ADMISSION

22-11-2021

FOR ADMISSION

05-11-2020

FOR ADMISSION

09-03-2020

FOR ADMISSION

04-02-2020

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

In WP 381/2016, the Bombay High Court heard a petition by Harsha Hemant Bhowad against the State of Maharashtra and others. On 17th April 2026, the court ordered "Remove from the Board" after the petitioner's counsel conceded that reliefs were only sought against the BMC, with the petition originating from 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In WP 381/2016, the Bombay High Court heard a petition by Harsha Hemant Bhowad against the State of Maharashtra and others. On 17th April 2026, the court ordered "Remove from the Board" after the petitioner's counsel conceded that reliefs were only sought against the BMC, with the petition originating from 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case