SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO LTD AMOL B SHINDE vs SAMUEL CHELLAIAH — EXA/947/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020357752023

Filing Number

EXA/35762/2023

Filing Date

22-Dec-2023

Registration No

EXA/947/2024

Registration Date

20-Apr-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO LTD AMOL B SHINDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAMUEL CHELLAIAH

  2. 2.PRAVIN NARAYAN KHARATMOL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications and set aside arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the time period from the original arbitration invocation when calculating limitation periods, unless there is a written agreement waiving the objection under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Oct-2025

    Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing MasterView PDF

  4. 01-Oct-2025

    Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing MasterView PDF

  5. 01-Oct-2025

    For Direction

    Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing Master

  6. 22-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/947/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications and set aside arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the time period from the original arbitration invocation when calculating limitation periods, unless there is a written agreement waiving the objection under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case