VIRENDAR KUMAR SINGH vs POWAI EDUCATION COMMITTEE A REGISTERED TRUST Advocate - C R NAIDU AND CO — WP/4907/2025
Case under Mah. Universities Act, 1994 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020354182025
Filing Number
WP/35417/2025
Filing Date
06-Nov-2025
Registration No
WP/4907/2025
Registration Date
15-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Bench Type
Division
Category
OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )
Sub-Category
TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIRENDAR KUMAR SINGH
Adv. Sadasivan Chittur Ramanathan,AMEERUL HSAN SAYYED,AMEERUL HSAN SAYYED, AMEERUL HSAN SAYYED
Respondent(s)
-
1.POWAI EDUCATION COMMITTEE A REGISTERED TRUST Advocate - C R NAIDU AND CO
-
2.BUNTS SANGHAS S.M. SHETTY COLLEGE OF SCIENCE
Adv. C R NAIDU AND CO
-
3.THE UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 4907 of 2025 filed by Virendar Kumar Singh against Powai Education Committee and others as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that it had become infructuous (served no useful purpose), which the court granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
22-Dec-2025
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
06-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4907/2025
Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 4907 of 2025 filed by Virendar Kumar Singh against Powai Education Committee and others as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that it had become infructuous (served no useful purpose), which the court granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts