DEEPAK KONDAJI AHIRE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ( THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT) Advocate - GP OS — WP/1994/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020351052025
Filing Number
WP/35105/2025
Filing Date
03-11-2025
Registration No
WP/1994/2026
Registration Date
22-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
SLUM AREAS ( 49 )
Sub-Category
Slum areas ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEEPAK KONDAJI AHIRE
Adv. Amarendra Mishra
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ( THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT) Advocate - GP OS
SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
VARDHAN HOUSING
BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR CHS (SRA)
DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (SRA)
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (ENC. AND REMOVAL)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging a 2015 Letter of Intent (LOI) issued by the State, declining to directly adjudicate the challenge since a related application is pending before the High Power Committee (SRA). However, the court directed the SRA to expeditiously decide the pending Application No. 17 of 2016 within 10 weeks from the order date, keeping all contentions open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging a 2015 Letter of Intent (LOI) issued by the State, declining to directly adjudicate the challenge since a related application is pending before the High Power Committee (SRA). However, the court directed the SRA to expeditiously decide the pending Application No. 17 of 2016 within 10 weeks from the order date, keeping all contentions open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts